Official GameTec Lo...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Official GameTec Logo Discussion

Page 6 / 6

Posts: 0
(@AngelXXX)
New Member
Joined: 1 second ago

You do realize that these are just concept ideas and not the actual thing? We are laying down design ideas to come up with something better. Obviously they are decent designs because everyone else agrees. Amazing, you are just acting out because of what happened in recent events and because your artistic work on the medals was called sh*t by someone else. Just for the record, I liked the medals you designed. Room for improvement, surely. Just like there is room for improvement with these concepts.

I was just saying, those are avatars and not logo designs. If you are going to so a logo design then it would have no colour and be a vector piece of artwork for getting the shape down, then adding the colours, background and other things that you want onto it later... ATM this is some text on a background not a logo, you also can't use that as a logo because of the font. Unless you design a font or pay for the licence for one then you can't use it in a logo and will have the site shut down for illegal use of materials...so just an idea...

Reply
Posts: 0
 Wavy
Topic starter
(@Wavy)
New Member
Joined: 10 years ago

I was just saying, those are avatars and not logo designs. If you are going to so a logo design then it would have no colour and be a vector piece of artwork for getting the shape down, then adding the colours, background and other things that you want onto it later... ATM this is some text on a background not a logo, you also can't use that as a logo because of the font. Unless you design a font or pay for the licence for one then you can't use it in a logo and will have the site shut down for illegal use of materials...so just an idea...

The "GT" is something I created myself, and is not any copyrighted font at all. Also, this is not text on a background again because I made it from scratch. So no, the site would not be shut down and it is a logo. It originally WAS a black vector image before we started adding color schemes because people wanted to see it in some color. I have already moved past the vector shaping stage. Again I am talking about the GT logo, not the other one whom someone else made. Thanks for the input and warnings, but its a logo unaffiliated with anything copyrighted.

Reply
Posts: 0
(@AngelXXX)
New Member
Joined: 1 second ago

The "GT" is something I created myself, and is not any copyrighted font at all. Also, this is not text on a background again because I made it from scratch. So no, the site would not be shut down and it is a logo. It originally WAS a black vector image before we started adding color schemes because people wanted to see it in some color. I have already moved past the vector shaping stage. Again I am talking about the GT logo, not the other one whom someone else made. Thanks for the input and warnings, but its a logo unaffiliated with anything copyrighted.

Really...It looks oddly similar to the font in your signature...

Reply
Posts: 0
 Wavy
Topic starter
(@Wavy)
New Member
Joined: 10 years ago

Really...It looks oddly similar to the font in your signature...

I can assure you it is not. The text in my signature is called Alexis, look it up. Looks nothing similar. Now quit arguing an invalid point. Thanks.

Reply
Posts: 0
(@Teufel Hunden)
New Member
Joined: 10 years ago

Damn, this is a hard one honestly. I like both of them. If it's a logo, like the type that's on the tab. I may be wrong.

I suggest the first one have "GT". The "G" is just like "Game" you need the "Tec". Try adding "GT" to the first logo. The left one of the second pair of logos is a better than the one on the right. Also, if we're choosing the second pair of logos add more color to it. It's too bland. Sort of, morph them together. Try both of y'all, sitting down, and figure out how y'all can put them together.

Reply
Page 6 / 6